Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

My Day in Your Life

Tuesday, March 6th, 2012

My most memorable day on my trip to Bangladesh this year was the day I stepped out of my sheltered “foreigner” life in the rich, embassy-laden north Dhaka district of Gulshan and took a journey into the middle-class life of a Bengali student. She’s also my colleague, a screenwriter and translator at BCM. But that day, she was a window into another world.

The day started when I drove (”was driven,” to be more precise) to meet Shyama at the bus stop. We crossed the highway (yes, I mean we literally played a game of frogger across a highway-like intersection with no traffic lights or crosswalks) and waited for several minutes for the old school double-decker London-style bus to come pick us up. This bus is only for students, so Shyama made me promise to identify myself as her “research assistant” if we were questioned by anyone. But as it turned out, they didn’t care. When the bus came, we just jumped on board and entered the fray of students.

“If we get a seat on the bus,” Shyama had told me, “the other girls will give us their bags to hold. That’s just the way things are on the student bus. It’s awkward to hold your own bag when it’s so crowded.”

The student bus was unlike anything I had ever seen. It looked like a regular double-decker bus, but one that had been through a number of accidents, explosions, implosions and perhaps a couple of world wars. Inside it was cheerful, but tattered. Most of the cheeriness came from the bus riders, which were divided: women on the bottom floor, men on the top. Hence, I didn’t see any young men during the whole trip. Shyama and I eyed a few remaining empty seats at the back of the bus, facing the aisle, and sat down. As the bus glided through stops and starts, picking up more and more students, it became evident to me why this “divided bus” was so critical. Until you’ve been a woman in a country where you are surrounded by men who believe it is their god-given right to oggle, cat-call, stare and sometimes even grope the relatively few women they see in public, you won’t understand the collective relief and freedom and outright liberation of a divided bus.

Soon, young ladies in colorful shalwar kameez, some in headscarves, beautiful shawls and even a burqua or two, crowded onto the bus. Not only were all the seats filled, but the aisle was filled with women standing three rows deep, chatting to each other about homework, new clothes, their favorite songs and just about anything else you might imagine 20-something girls chatting about. Shyama’s friends asked her who I was, and why I was on the bus, as they dumped their purses and bags in her lap — just as she had predicted. Eventually, I felt a “plop” as my lap became another purse-holder. Before I knew it, a stack of Gucci, Chanel, cute bunny, brightly flowered and all-out girly bags were piled on top of my lap. A girl standing near me said to Shyama, “Your friend is really nice. She even holds our bags!” I replied “Don’t you know? That’s the rule on this bus!”

A mere hour and a half later, we reached the entrance to Dhaka University, a hive of excitement. Students lined the outdoor hallways, rushing to and from class. Shyama led me past the outdoor food stalls, school buildings and quads. A few rickshaws bounced down the narrow footpaths, tinkling their little bells and hoping that the sea of students would part for them. Inside the buildings were hallways that opened onto the courtyards, like the walkways outside a 4-story motel: no windows, just open air. The hallways were dim and dingy, with notice boards of student announcements spread across the outside-facing corridors, where there was more light. I imagined students from Stanford, Yale, Harvard — even my own humble institution, Azusa Pacific — being appalled at the lack of white-walled, trash-and-recycle-cans-laden, pristine ivory towers that are such a natural trick of academic pretension in the US. And yet, in spite of the darkness (punctuated I’m sure by the city’s frequent blackouts), the lack of janitorial staff or wall-scrubbers, this was truly an institution of higher learning: this is where the young, ambitious, idealistic leaders of tomorrow’s Bangladesh struggled and strove to come. This was a university full of more grateful, anxious, voracious learners than I’m sure most of the top universities in my country could aspire to.

We sat down on a sidewalk outside one of the buildings, after Shyama had showed me around a bit. “This is Dhaka University’s longest couch,” she said as we sat down on the sidewalk and enjoyed a quick student’s breakfast of tea and samosas and something like sour cream crepes. We left the glass dishes on the sidewalk, where the food stall staff would find them, rinse them and serve the next student with them.

Inside her department’s building, we walked down a hallway and through a curtain, into another magical room: an all-women study room. Shyama explained that the university had two rooms like this, which included a few bathrooms, a convenience store full of everything from snacks to pencils to tampons, a copy center (walled off and staffed by a few men) and a large room full of tables where the ladies could eat, study, or just sit. The room ran on the quiet hum of girls studying, whispering and waiting in line for the toilet. The copy machines, in their enclosed room, churned in the background.

Shyama introduced me to a non-university friend just before she went to class. He was to entertain me during the lecture. I thought I might go to the lecture, but then I realized that it would all be in Bangla, and probably not that interesting for me to listen to; so I went with her friend, whose name to me sounded like “Orchid,” so that’s what I’ll call him here, a gruff, smiling teddy bear with a beard and curly hair — and I’ll call him Orchid.

Orchid, who I learned was in the business of marketing and advertising, took me off campus to the poet’s cemetery next door, and the art college after that. The art college was full of students performing different disciplines, as you would expect: a group sitting next to a brick wall, sketching the flowers, grass and cracks of the wall; some students sculpting busts and statues; scattered painters capturing pastoral scenes of flowers, sunsets, gardens, trees. This too, was a world different from the bustling, busy Dhaka streets as well as the churning, active youth of the university. It was peaceful, quiet and forward-thinking. Philosophical even, maybe. In the philosophical mood, Orchid told me about his advertising job and complained of the corruption that’s so rampant in so many industries in Bangladesh (and in fact, this is the subject of the TV pilot I shot there).

“This is how a pitch meeting works,” he explained to me. “The client will call up different agencies and ask for a marketing strategy. The company will send a mid-level manager to have a meeting with me, at my agency, and I’ll deliver the pitch. Once I deliver the pitch, he’ll ask, ‘What’s in it for me?’ This means, what extra kick-back am I willing to give him in order to get the contract. He’ll make this request to every marketing agency he has a meeting with, and give the contract to the agency who promises him the highest bribe. And the only way for us to pay this bribe to get his business is to include the kickback in the bid we’ve already given to his company.”

Sad, but true: it doesn’t matter what marketing genius agencies come up with; if they can’t pay the bribe to the client, they’ll never get the job.

I filed this little piece of social commentary away in my head as we kept walking. We made our way to the public library, where I regarded the outdated 70s textbooks in the English section with suspicion. A fascinating place, this library. Soon Shyama called, finished with her class, and we reconvened for a cup of cha at The Campus Shadow (”The cheapest cha you’ll find at Dhaka University,” Shyama assured me knowledgeably) with several of her friends. I bought an English-language newspaper and caught up on Pakistan’s latest blunders, the Bengali election race and news of Mitt Romney’s victory in an East Coast primary.

After saying “goodbye” to Shyama’s friends for a full 20 minutes (a “goodbye” followed by more chatting, followed by another bid to depart, followed by more socializing, etc…), we were almost on our way off Campus for a look-see at the local market. We ran into a few more friends, one of whom told us his name was “Dude.” I asked, smuggly, “Have you ever seen The Big Lebowski,” expecting a blank stare. But he replied, “Yeah, that’s where I got my nickname!” We talked about movies for awhile, of which Dude had seen tons. In fact, the whole morning, as Shyama introduced me and said my name, Bengali students kept asking if I had seen the movie Amelie, because they all heard my name as “Amelie” instead of “Emily.”

Soon we continued on to a shopping market nearby to the university. Shyama showed me a shop she loved, where carvers made little statues of the Buddha, Shiva, Vishnu, classical statues, scenes of Dhaka and rickshaws. We were searching for desk lamps for our office, but only found a few awesome shops, like a t-shirt shop with a blue shirt featuring a glass of water that showed a half-full glass. The half with water read, “1/2 water” and the other half read “1/2 air.” Below the glass, it read, “Technically, the glass is always full.”

Eventually, we continued on to a place that Orchid insisted would have the best lamps: a 40-minute rickshaw ride from campus. The three of us piled onto a rickshaw, a three-wheeled bicycle meant for 2 passengers and one rickshaw wallah. The struggling wallah dutifully carried the three of us, with Shyama sitting on the top and Orchid and I on either side of the downward-sloping seat, for a good 25 minutes before he pulled over on a side street to stop for a break. Then we switched spots, and I sat on the top of the seat. It was brilliant! Best rickshaw ride I’ve ever head. In fact, I’ve since thought about riding on top of the seat rather than on the seat when I’m by myself. Why? Because the seat is slanted forward — downward. Even if I ride by myself, I always feel like I’m fighting to hold myself to the seat. But sitting on top of the seat-back is completely flat. It’s brilliant!

Once we reached the lamp store, we found an amazing collection of hand-made goods, including a desk lamp fashioned in the shape of a palm tree with several bouncing fronds atop the coconut punctured with holes, in which sat a tiny light bulb. Besides these amazing desk lamps, I picked up two mugs: one carved out of bamboo, the other made of a coconut shell (what a versatile material!). We asked for 2 additional palm tree lamps, which prompted the shopkeeper to call the local artist. He said he could make us two more in a few days.

After this shopping trip, we were miles away from the university and hungry. And on top of that, Orchid needed the internet for some emergency work task. So we ordered some take-out and headed to Orchid’s friend’s house. His friend turned out to be a completely western Bengali, complete with a fro, Latin r&b bumping from his computer speakers. He cautioned us that his grandmother had  better not see our take-out, otherwise she would be very offended. (It’s not polite to visit someone’s house and not drink their tea or eat their biscuits; bringing in food from the outside is incredibly rude.) So we hid and ate in his room. We passed an hour with him, trading musical suggestions, looking at pictures of Facebook and talking about economics books. I recommended he start listening to kcrw.com. Finally, his mother poked her head into the room and said hi. The whole situation was extremely awkward, unusual and a little salacious in the Bengali context I was used to, but Shyama and I were in the company of such “normal” (to my western standards) young dudes, that it was actually not all that awkward.

Eventually, we continued on our way back to Dhaka University, which was hosting a huge book fair. I was asked for a number of photographs, conversations and even an interview at the book fair, all of which Shyama flatly rejected for me. This was the awkward type of unwanted male attention I had feared all day: and oddly, it wasn’t until we encountered the “bookish types” that I actually experienced what is so normal in north-west Dhaka.

As dusk set in, we realized it was time to go home: in rush hour. We took a taxi, three rickshaws and our own feet to the American Club, where I met up with my boss and his family almost 2 hours later. Both Shyama and Orchid accompanied me the whole way, although Shyama’s mother was I’m sure worried about her late homecoming.

And herein lies the main difference between life in my world and hers: for college students and young adults like me in Los Angeles, nighttime is only the beginning. There are plenty of places to find yourself after dark — a movie, play, museum, dance party, bar, concert — and it’s up to you when you go home. We’re so mobile and independent. But for a young lady like Shyama, contemporary as she may be, life after dark is meant to be experienced at home. And if it’s not, it’s headed home. Hopefully accompanied by a watchful male protector.

Notes from the Final Frontier

Saturday, January 28th, 2012

Yesterday morning I got up at 6am, got ready and hopped in the car at 6:45, just in time to make the 7am call time. All was silent on the way to set (our office). The large Gulshan intersection was oddly quiet. The streets were deserted. The morning was calm. When we reached the office, I trudged upstairs and tried the door handle: locked.

I called the line producer: no answer. I called the producer: no answer. I called some other people that work at our office: no answer. I called my translator: no answer. I would have called the 1st AD, but we fired him yesterday. There was no one in sight. Did I land in some alternate universe where my crew no longer existed? (Perhaps an episode of “Dr. Who” from the previous evening precipitated that thought.)

After my driver and I made countless phone calls to anyone we could think of, I finally managed to rouse the producer (who wasn’t meant to be on set) and get the office key. Slowly by slowly, after getting in touch with the line producer, our crew started to straggle into the office, between 7:45 and 8:30. Shyama, my translator, AND the gaffer apologized personally to me for being late.

What’s wrong with this picture?

This was, in fact, the first true “Bengali day” in three days of shooting in Bangladesh. Generally, this is the way things work: you set a call time, people straggle in between 1 and 2 hours after call time, and you begin your day in fits and starts about 4 hours after you thought you would. No one apologizes, or really even notices. It’s a true novelty to even hear them apologize! And this was the first of THREE shooting days on which I was the first person to set. The previous two days, impressive in their timeliness, ran long but productive, in spite of a 1st AD who consistently showed up late and did little. Complete with the various hiccups, turf wars, actor dramas and circuit breaker failures that comprise a normal shooting day, our first two days had run remarkably like “set” in America. But today was a regular Bengali day. After the initial delay, we spent 1.5 hours moving from location A to location B, and waited at location B for everything from dramatic make-up failures to a Muslim actor who held us up for 20 minutes while she bowed towards Mecca and said her prayers.

But if that’s all I have to complain about, I’d say we’re doing remarkably well.

Today I’ve been transcoding  footage, which requires an awful lot of waiting and very little do-ing. In this meantime, I meant to spice this post up with some photos, but my technical know-how has apparently been spent on the transcoding because I can’t figure out how to make you see the photos I’m trying to upload on here. Thus, I’ll go with the old-fashioned way and link you to my album here:

Voila! It’s movies in the Desh!

Twit-evil(le)

Thursday, November 17th, 2011

Loving the @jonstewart show today.

Check out this great episode of @planetmoney.

@bout how long has it been since I composed an e-thought of more than 140 characters?

Over the past few months, I’ve been trying to re-establish my presence on Twitter. The reasons for this are twofold: first, I wanted to re-establish contact with some of the great people I started meeting in my first phase of tweeting, a few years go; secondly, I’m trying to promote a Kickstarter campaign for my film, Transnationals, and word on the street is, Twittville is the place to be.

Now, there are certainly great things about Twitter. It is definitely a “community” space where people can share their thoughts, give and get advice, promote their stuff — all without that creepy chat-room feel. (Why no creepy chat-room feel? I’m still not sure.) But it’s also a massive time-waster that fosters this “keep up with the Joneses” mentality that almost necessitates that you keep checking, keep tweeting, keep responding — keep on keeping on in the spotlight. That’s probably why there are nearly as many “how to get more Twitter followers” tweets as there are Twitter users!  That’s the part of Twitter that just makes it feel like one big giant narcissistic PR campaign.

Oh, and the fact that most of your thoughts must be truncated, oddly spelled (to save characters, of course) and re-purposed into catchy soundbites  with mass marketing appeal. I really don’t dig that.

So why do I persist with Twitter? Can I persist beyond the threshhold of 3 or 4 months? Will I continue to tweet once I don’t “need” Twitter’s much-touted marketing help? Only time will tell. But, as with too much of ANY good thing, right now I just feel like it’s bad. Really, really bad. Poor Twitter. You once held such promise….

The City

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

I love the city.

I love the city of Los Angeles, specifically, but I also just really love cities. On Sunday in church, the message was about cities, and how they are the “cultural and economic crossroads of the world,” which causes the most creative, industrious and cunning creatures to flock to them. And that number keeps growing and growing: In 1800, 3% of the world lived in cities. In 1900, it was 14%. Today, over 50% of the world lives in cities.

Do we really have that many culture-makers out there? Or do we just seek connection with those that are at the same time just like us, and utterly different from us?

And, because of the experience of alike-but-different, we create culture. We create technology. We create industry. We create. Or we participate in someone else’s creation. Or, ultimately, we follow and consume, when something that celebrates diversity and connects universally is created. After all, we are people, and it’s this alike-but-different that moves us and causes us to do what we do. Maybe I shouldn’t speak for all of “us” though.

My one-time landlord in San Francisco told me an interesting thing about America’s three greatest culture-making cities: “Smart people go to San Francisco. Ambitious people go to New York. But smart and ambitious people flock to Los Angeles.”

Hmmmm…

Social Caterpillar

Monday, October 31st, 2011

This week, I’m unveiling some of the social media stuff I’ve been working on for my film, Transnationals. It seems a bit backwards that I have to start marketing a film before I’ve even made it, but I guess that’s how the world works today. I have to shut off my inner luddite and start websites, twitter and facebook pages, a kickstarter site, a trailer, a photo album and a whole cult of personality around a script and (let’s be real, here) myself! I’m not comfortable with that — at all!!

But I’m trudging along. Today, I launched Transnationals on Facebook. I’m on Twitter too, despite not having any followers. It’s Kickstarter tomorrow (link to follow) and any day now, you can go to www.transnationals-movie.com and the website will be up and about! There is something very unclean about this. It seems untoward and selfish to seek out all of this attention, yet this is the culture we’ve created. “He who screams the loudest is heard.” The web can be a cruel place for those not aggressive enough to preach their own gospel. That’s always been my problem, whether I’m launching a short film, a story, a blog or anything else I’ve worked on. I’m too afraid to ask for a pat on the back, and I squeeze my eyes shut, tense my muscles and wait for the storm to pass when I put my work out there (once and for all) for all of my friends. Then I’m back to hiding in my own little corner, working on the next thing, while I hope and pray that the world has forgotten all about me.

Except that I don’t want it to. I want them to come back. I want to produce more and more, so they don’t have to be told to come back.

Such is the artist’s paradox: we do our art for no one, but in order to keep doing it, we must appeal to someone – anyone, or even everyone. Even though we are all just social caterpillars.

Lila, Lila, What Have You Done to Me?

Thursday, October 27th, 2011

Yesterday I went to the last day of San Francisco’s “Berlin and Beyond” film festival of German language films from around Europe. I saw the film Lila, Lila, which interested me with it’s very familiar premise: a young man picks up a piece of antique furniture at a flea market. The piece has a jammed door and, when the young man un-jams it, a sea of papers that make up a brilliant manuscript stand before the young man. The story in those papers then begins to effect change through the man’s entire life.

Sound familiar? If you happen to know me, or if you nurture a similar preoccupation with Soren Kierkegaard, this material might sound like it came straight from the ficticious forward of Kierkegaard’s first work, Either/Or, or from the screenplay of that same name that I wrote, based on the book. But in fact, the film Lila, Lila does not  pay tribute to Kierkegaard (or to me, sadly) but to a German author by the name of  Martin Suter. Clearly lifting the original premise from Kierkegaard’s work, Suter wrote a clever book that has been adapted, rather smartly, into this concise, subtle, clever, funny, moving film starring one of my favorite German actors, Daniel Brul.

With mixed emotions I watched as Brul took a fateful journey from unknown waiter to literary sensation when he claimed the pages as his own to impress a girl. The girl promptly turns the manuscript over to a publisher, and Brul’s new life as jet-setting author, mobbed by fans, commences. But as the shy, unassuming young fellow finds his lies to the girl, now his girlfriend, increasingly unnerving, things take an even worse turn when the author himself shows up in his life. The real author is a down-on-his-luck alcoholic and bum. Poaching money off the freshly-minted new literary sensation seems to keep him quite happy to keep quiet, but as “the real author” becomes increasingly manic and unruly, it causes young Brul’s life to spin wildly out of control and his romance to develop much like the events of his “book.”

As things began to unravel, I found myself sitting on the edge of my seat, in complete suspense. How would the young would-be author resolve his situation? Would he live to write a “second” book? And most of all, would this bloody movie turn my own Either/Or into an impossible dream?!

No.

The beautiful thing about the movie is that, although the premise is similar, it’s not about Either/Or at all; it’s not really even about philosophy. It’s about a young man who doesn’t know who he is, finding his identity by stealing someone else’s. On the contrary, Kierkegaard’s work is about two ways of living, embodied by two different characters, but usually melded into one incongruous, messy, hypocritical self: all of us. I’m not sure if Kierkegaard’s book actually makes a film at all. It may just make a nice piece of philosophical pie. And I think that’s what I love about this movie: it’s not trying to be something, or do something (in the way that I am when I write about Kierkegaard): it’s just a simple love story, boiled down to its basic elements, and it happens to unravel in a fresh, exciting, interesting way.

Hail to the Germans!

Getting To Know You

Monday, October 10th, 2011

I spent the better part of last week reading blogs by adoptees, the parents of adoptees and Asian-Americans in an effort to learn more about the audience I think will be most interested in my film. What I’ve found has been an overwhelmingly introspective, informative and often funny community of people who are many times misunderstood, while themselves being very astute cultural observers. I only wish more Americans from the cultural majority could produce this much insight on their own culture, much less take the time to listen to the stories of Americans in the minority and try to understand the cultural anthropology of our non-homogeneous, incredibly diverse society.

Take, for instance, The Korean! , a witty, insightful blogger who takes a Q-and-A approach to Americans wishing to learn about Korea and unexpectedly pummels them with knowledge and a good bit of sardonic jabbing, for those who dare to ask stupid questions . His blog, “Ask a Korean!”, answers questions on all sorts of topics: Confucianism, the Korea-Japan relationship, tiger moms, how to tell Koreans apart from other Asians just  by looking at them, and even topics as obscure as fan death! The adopted Korean comedienne Amy Anderson talks openly about her Swedish family from Minnesota, all of whom were adopted themselves, which is kind of a refreshing take on the concept of family. But there are just as many other adoptees who do not fare so well in the process of adoption or cultural assimilation and speak openly about the deep grief they feel over the loss of their birth family, abuse by their adoptive family or the pain of transracial adoption, with which children are afforded “white privilege” when they’re with their adoptive family, but have to stand alone in a world of prejudice when they leave that safety net. Adoptee blogger Paula O’Loughlin of Heart, Mind and Seoul speaks about this in her blog about “Why People are Nicer to Daddy,” something she was asked about by her own biological, interracial kids. Still, many other transnational adoptees describe their experience as being “white on the inside” and in fact, they are often surprised when they see themselves in the mirror and they aren’t white. My own Korean cousin describes herself as a “coconut.” Other adoptees use “banana” or “oreo” to describe the way that white, middle-class American culture has so permeated their identities, to the very core.

Without judgement, without commentary, without explanation: this is the experience of so many Americans who are our friends, neighbors, teachers, colleagues, bosses, students and of course… family.

I’m a third generation German-American. Both of my parents have 100% German-Polish ancestry that I can trace back for 5 generations. My skin looks like theirs. So why am I so interested in this radically different experience of life in America? Because without knowing what dichotomies characterize my own people, how can I learn anything about the cultures of other people from traveling the world?

Personal Preference

Monday, October 3rd, 2011

This week, I’ve been talking with a casting director about casting my film, Transnationals. It could be a casting director’s dream because it’s a small story that’s an ideal vehicle for new talent. There aren’t a lot of established talents that really fit my roles — at least, not here in the US. In Asia, there are some huge actors that I’d like to target, like Lee Min Ho or Rain from Korea, and Aishwarya Rai, one of the biggest stars of Bollywood. But here at home, my movie doesn’t call for anyone of that sort of celebrity status, which is kind of a blessing in disguise (no big names = no divas!). All that to say, as I’ve been thinking so much about casting, it prompted me to compile this list of a few of my favorite actors of the moment…

josephJoseph Gordon-Levitt: Once a creepy long-haired alien kid posing as the son of even-weirder John Lithgow in Third Rock From the Sun, I think this perpetual man-child has finally come into his own. I just saw 50/50, which was just another opportunity for him to surprise me with his subtle, natural, slightly awkward way of making “cute white guy who’s down on his luck” actually seem real, believable and poignant. He even did this in the less-stellar Zooey Deschanel vehicle, (500) Days of Summer. I was not a huge fan of that movie, but his performance didn’t disappoint. But let’s talk about his choice of roles in the past, which is infinitely more interesting (see photo). Rian Johnson’s 2005 film Brick is one of my favorite films of the past decade: the script was amazing, the dialogue so pitch-perfect it’s uncanny, and the execution was brilliant. Every detail was just right. It was a little-film-that-could, gone absolutely, concretely, unabashedly right. Go a bit further back in the actor’s history when he played David Collins in a 1990 re-make of one of my all-time-favorite TV shows, Dark Shadows. I loved the original 60s version, which lasted much longer than the 90s remake, but the casting of the 90s version was absolutely spot-on. Gordon-Levitt was great as the bratty misfit, David. All and all, I think he’s THE great actor of my generation. Oh – and then there’s stuff like this out there: Check out Morgan M. Morganson\’s Date with Destiny

l5001835-20

Rebecca Hazelwood: Sure, I’ve only started following her recently, as a result of my new obsession with the television show Outsourced, but already I know there is something magical about Hazelwood, beyond the obvious “exotic beauty” calling card. She, like a number of other western-born Indian actresses out there, is trying to distinguish herself  by playing provocative characters in provocative dramas (Kissing Cousins, The Ode) but I think her true success will come when she embraces her potential and starts playing strong women characters. Perhaps she’s gotta fight past the “repressed Indian woman” stereotype before she can do that, but I think she’ll manage. She’s got such obvious star power.

12888829_ori

Audrey Tautou: In spite of a filmography with just as many massive hits as supreme misses, I still think Tautou is brilliant. She’s one of the non-English-speaking-world’s most recognizable female faces in America (although Marion Cotillard is hot on her heels these days) and somehow, no matter how many times she loses her head and makes a movie like Priceless or The Da Vinci Code, she’ll always run back to a great director and do something amazing. I’m satisfied that she’s spent her career hopping back and forth from celebrity status in the small French film industry to “supporting player” English language films. I was one of a few people who loved Dirty Pretty Things, but I understand that she can’t make films like that all the time: she’s a comedienne, and she needs roles worthy of quirky leading lady. It’s true, she’s no new, undiscovered talent, but she remains one of my favorites of the moment, so here she belongs, on my list of love.

Cillian Murphy: I’ve been following this young Irish actor since the days of Disco Pigs,

cillian-murphywhich led him to a short, beautiful string of indie performances (Intermission, Girl with the Pearl Earring, 28 Days Later) before Hollywood snapped him up as an evil bad guy with an accent (see the awful Red Eye, or better films, like Batman Begins, The Dark Knight and Inception) but I think there’s still more out there for him in terms of festival shorts, heart-wrenching dramas and small, Irish stories. If you ask me, Ireland is one of the most under-valued film centers in Europe; and with that under-utilized potential, there are probably dozens of actors of Murphy’s caliber going totally to waste. Murphy is obviously torn between Indie-wood and Hollywood; personally, I hope he returns to his roots and makes a few more Danny Boyle-style films across the pond to restore his street cred as an indie lead. I have Ewan McGregor-like dreams for this one, I do.


Transnationals

Tuesday, September 13th, 2011

Earlier this year, I shot five films in Bangladesh. It was my third time to the country, but never does it fail to captivate my imagination – each time for a different reason. This time, I got to thinking back about the first time I was in Bangladesh, and the story that had been marinating in my mind ever since. In May, I visited Cambodia to work on my shorts with my editor. And after those four intense weeks I had not only finished 5 short films, I had also written the first draft of what was to become “Transnationals,” my fourth feature screenplay.

Except there was a difference between this screenplay and the others: people actually liked it! My friends liked it, my colleagues liked it – people started to get excited! So, a few drafts, many notes and some increased confidence later, I decided in August that I was going to make the film: I AM going to make the film! It’s about three Asian-American adoptees who each return to their birth country to seek out the culture, family and identity they never knew.

People have been asking me why I’d choose to write a story like this. It wasn’t in Cambodia, playing ultimate frisbee with the national team called “Angelina’s Orphans” that I chose to write about adoptees. And it wasn’t even necessarily because I grew up with two adopted cousins from Korea. No, it was a certain experience in Bangladesh in 2006, some five years ago, that first sparked my interest in the subject. Below is an essay I wrote on the subject…

“I  have always had a soft spot for the exotic, colorful, magical land of singing and dancing that is India. So in the beginning of 2006, I was thrilled to be offered a job in Bangladesh to work on a documentary short. A sign in the airport read, “Get here before all the tourists do!” It didn’t take long to see why tourists bypass India’s eastern neighbor and former annex: crushing poverty, lack of infrastructure, narrowly-defined social norms and a government-led disdain for outside influence.

A few weeks later, I met a 23 year old French-Canadian woman who had been adopted from Bangladesh as a baby. If I found the reality of Bangladesh a harsh contrast to the colorful Bollywood movie I’d had playing in my head, I could hardly imagine her feeligns of displacement in her own homeland. It seems her expectations were similar to mine. But for all of the strange and sometimes-traumatic stories I had about the country, what she was experiencing as a “foreigner” was altogether different.

I remember walking into a high-end retail store with her and another white foreigner. The white foreigner and I walked right in while two armed guards stopped her outside and forced her to turn in her backpack before she entered. I was confused until my white foreign fright told me it was because she looked Bengali. It was then that I first thought about what it must be like to be a transnational adoptee: halfway between the white, middle-class Western families they grew up with and the homogenous Asian cultures with whom they only have a skin color in common. It’s a strange island of misfits that make up a large part of the 6 million adopted children in the U.S.

Through the landscape of transnational Asian adoption, which started after the Korean War when many babies were orphaned, or born to American soldiers and Korean mothers who later abandoned them, three cultures stood out to me and piqued my interest in the people who are now adult adoptees. Japan, for its traditionalism and homogeneity, which seems to reject any sense of multi-culturalism; Korea, the homeland of more international adoptees than any country in the world; and Bangladesh, because it is the home of at least one French-Canadian whose image is forever burned in my memory.”

Photoblog: Part 2

Friday, April 29th, 2011

Today I’ll move on to my photos of Cambodia. Here I’ve noticed a marked shift that I may not have realized when thinking conceptually about it: I’ve graduated from “South Asia” into “Southeast Asia.” This is where all of your “Asia” stereotypes really come from. Like the constant and abusive (but funny) Engrish, indecipherable accents, constant bowing, the whole “saving face” thing… and noodles! Tons of noodles!

Beer time!

Beer time!

I found it extremely funny that this was a kids’ shirt. I’d hope my 3-year-old wasn’t wearing a shirt that said “Hello beer!” on it. But then again, I could hardly resist getting this for my own 3-year-old niece….

Dead duck

Dead duck

I found it re-assuring that ALL of my Asian stereotypes were being fulfilled on that first day in Phnom Penh: absurd misspellings of English AND dead birds hanging off someone’s food truck. It was really better than I could have even expected.

Moto!

Moto!

Motos are transport from families of 2 to 5. Often, the front passenger will be a little toddler with hands firmly affixed to the handlebars. Behind Toddler will be the driver, followed by another infant and mother… or sisters… etc. It’s quite a sight.

A few passengers

A few passengers

Just another example of the absolute crammage of bodies onto one vehicle. Dan has some much more excellent photos in this department.

Riverside...

Riverside...

When I arrived in Siem Reap, it was picturesque, but brutally hot. And it only got hotter.

Not bad for $14 a night!

Not bad for $14 a night!

This was my adorable hotel room in Siem Reap, for cheap!! All of this luxury, complete with AC, a TV and a private shower/bathroom is the kind of amazing value for money that Cambodia offers. It’s really swell.

Little Angkor

Little Angkor

It’s hard to know what to say or what to post about Angkor. It’s kind of something you just have to experience for yourself. One thing that continues to amaze me about Cambodia is the smiles of its people. I asked this little boy for a photo and a smile, and I think he’s just as impressive as any surrounding temple.

Angkor Vat

Angkor Vat

But in case you’d rather see temples, I’ve got those too.

Steep

Steep

Delicious Sunlight

Delicious Sunlight

Buddha worship

Buddha worship

Concentric Temples

Concentric Temples

Rock formations

Rock formations

Which god?

Which god?

Framed

Framed

Breakfast

Breakfast

This is my tuk-tuk driving eating a noodle breakfast. He was so chill.

Soap Farm

Soap Farm

I visited a candle-making and soap-making place back in Siem Reap. It’s one of those “fair trade, direct from the source” type of places.

Tineapple!

Tineapple!

Cambodia is a land of tiny pineapples. I thought this was just a baby pineapple until I saw a normal pineapple in a grocery store and realized that they don’t get a whole lot bigger than this: the green spiky hair of the pineapple is usually bigger than the fruit itself. Are our pineapples just genetically deformed so monstrously that they become huge and ridiculous, or are these babes the ones with stunted growth?

Cardamom tea

Cardamom tea

As it turns out, Cambodians like to put anise or cardimom in nearly everything. I don’t think that’s such a bad deal. I could see myself getting really used to that….